December 16, 2009

Toys R Us Demonstrates How to Turn Current Customers into Former Customers

I ordered a big dollhouse from Toys R Us online.  It arrived on my doorstep in a giant box with a huge full-color picture of the dollhouse and accessories on the side of the box.  It wasn’t shipped in a plain cardboard box, no, it had to be a box that showed the entire world what was inside.

Now, why would a toy company ship toys right before Christmas in a box like this?  The future recipients of this toy nearly saw the box and ruined their Christmas morning surprise.  It was a true Christmas miracle that they looked out the wrong window when the delivery man rang the doorbell, and another miracle entirely that they didn’t open the door and see the box.

I emailed a complaint to Toys R Us customer service.  Nowhere on the site does it state that the dollhouse would be shipped in a box with a picture of the contents on the side (I triple checked before sending the email).  The site did state that gift wrap wasn’t available (I didn’t want it gift wrapped anyway).  It also stated that the item would be shipped separately.

Now, when a customer takes the time to complain, you owe it to them, as the business, to respond in a thoughtful and considerate manner, especially when the customer points out a real error.

The customer service rep’s first instinct shouldn’t be to patronize the customer, tell the customer that the website has fine print that they obviously didn’t read (especially when that fine print doesn’t exist at all), and that you’ve exhausted everything you could possibly do for them (especially when you did nothing since that customer could tell you were reading the email for the first time while on the phone).  The rep’s sarcastic tone didn’t help either, especially with someone long schooled in the fine art of sarcasm.

I didn’t want a refund or a free toy.  I wanted the company shipping toys before Christmas to realize how stupid it is to ship a toy in a box that doesn’t hide the contents of the box from anyone who might see that box.  A simple “I apologize” would have been sufficient.  Even better would have been: “We’ll update the shipping information on the site to explain how the item is shipped.”

Instead, your botched customer service call turned my basic frustration into a personal commitment to boycott Toys R Us.

Bah Humbug, Geoffrey the Giraffe.

1 Comment

Filed under Consumers, Marketing

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

December 7, 2009

Blowing Marketing Bubbles with Trouble Gum

I’m a fan of Matthew Cordell’s work in general, and specifically his first book as both author and illustrator, Trouble Gum.  I stumbled upon Matthew’s work a couple years ago when I was checking out the snowflakes for Robert’s Snow, a charity event where children’s book illustrators create unique snowflakes to be auctioned off for charity.  I really liked Matthew’s snowflake featuring children in their winter knit hats.

His style reminds me of William Steig of Shrek fame.  Wonderful pen and ink drawings with a scribble and doodle sensibility that adds a lot of warmth and interest.

What does all of this have to do with marketing?  Good question.  You see, Matthew, like a lot of writers, illustrators and artists, is deftly using marketing in general and social marketing specifically to cultivate an audience, drive sales and build long-term relationships with fans.  Major brands could learn a lot from someone like Matthew.

Once I recognized that I enjoyed his work, I started to periodically read Matthew’s blog where he provides insights into his in-progress projects, discusses his motivations, gives behind the scenes glimpses into his development process, talks about his family, and gives his audience a depth of information that you can’t get from a book’s dust jacket.  Social marketing gives writers and artists the power to grow their own fan base and build important relationships with their individual fans.

Matthew runs contests to build traffic to his blog, to generate buzz and to promote his work.

I happened to win a couple of those contests.  In the first, I won an original drawing from his book Trouble Gum.  Besides the drawing, he sent me a nice handwritten note and copies of promotional postcards from his other books.  I must say that I was very excited to receive this amazing prize.

In the other contest, I won a couple packs of promotional gum called Trouble Gum.  The packs were an ingenious promotional giveaway developed by Matthew and his publisher to promote his book at various events.

So, Matthew is building his brand, his audience and his business through hands-on, personable and memorable interactions with his books, his artwork, his website, his blog, his contests and his willingness to share himself with his fans.

He’s a growing marketing machine in the world of children’s literature and he’s doing it well.

1 Comment

Filed under Social Marketing, Surprise Marketing

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , ,

November 10, 2009

Social Media Delivers Patrons to Today’s Artists and Writers

I was always fascinated by the fact that thinkers, inventors and artists like DaVinci had patrons, someone to pay the bills and worry about the little, annoying and boring details while the artist was free to dream, create and innovate.

The internet and social media today provide a perfect platform for artists to cultivate their followers, customers and now their own patrons.  Take for example Jamie Tanner, a graphic novelist.  Now, I don’t know Jamie or anything about his art, but I was struck by the ingenuity of the fund-raising program he developed for his future project.  Not only is Jamie asking his audience for money to fund his new project, but he’s offering fantastic rewards from sketch books and original art to inclusion in the new project as a named character, like a version of product placement for individuals instead of big brands.  Maybe this can be termed “personal placement” instead.

This isn’t the first instance of online fund-raising by a writer or artist, but it’s certainly an ingenious one.  Jamie should be applauded for his efforts, and for the fact that he’s already exceeded his fund-raising goal.

The artist and the audience are both winners here.

The artist can secure funding upfront for a project instead of relying on income once the project is completed and released to the marketplace.  The potential pain of self-funding a project is gone.  The artist can also involve the audience in the project early on and make the overall project more of a collaboration by building a bond between the audience and project itself right from the start.  Any interested parties would definitely enjoy the behind the scenes views of a work-in-progress.

The audience not only gets the joy of being involved in a project right from the beginning, but can actually become a part of the work.  What could be better than becoming a character in your favorite author’s new book?  Amazing.

And, again for the artist, building stronger relationships with your audience is key in this continually fragmenting, long-tail marketplace.  Instead of attracting a huge audience for your work by catering to the needs or desires of everyone (and thereby watering down your product), you only need to attract a small, passionate following to develop a wildly successful career.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Consumers, innovation, Social Marketing

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , ,

November 2, 2009

Fly Marketing is Surprise Marketing

Eichborn, a German publisher with a fly for a logo, attached very tiny, ultra-light banners to 200 flies to promote their booth at the Frankfurt Book Fair.  These flies were like a fleet of miniature airplanes dragging promotional banners through the skies of the fair.

You can find a video of the promotion (and the reactions of the crowd) at www.eichborn.de or on YouTube.

This is another fantastic example of surprise marketing done right–use a unique and humorous approach to knock people out of their routine and get them to take notice and talk about your brand.

Well done, Eichborn.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Surprise Marketing

Tagged as , , , , ,

September 22, 2009

How to Improve Yoplait’s Save Lids to Save Lives Program

I grabbed a Yoplait yogurt out of my fridge and couldn’t help but notice the pink lid.  Yes, Yoplait is running their pink lid “Save Lids to Save Lives” campaign in support of Susan G. Komen for the Cure.  I’m a big supporter of breast cancer awareness and the search for a cure.  I’ve had friends and family with breast cancer, so I’ve seen first hand how breast cancer dramatically affected their lives and their families.

I’m also a huge supporter of corporations making donations to charity.  Most charities would be hard-pressed to provide their services without the valued corporate support.

What I don’t like is the hoops some companies make consumers jump through to support the corporation’s charitable donation.  Yoplait, for example, will donate 10 cents for every pink lid mailed in by consumers.  So, I need to buy Yoplait yogurt, save the lids, wash the lids, put them in an envelope and mail them to Yoplait?  Then, someone at Yoplait is going to open the envelopes, count the lids and approve the corresponding donation?  Seems like a lot of unnecessary time and money to support the search for a breast cancer cure.

Yes, I know, it’s a little time and effort on my part when so many women are battling cancer and fighting for their lives.  And their families and friends are suffering as well.  Trust me, I understand and I sympathize.

My point is that companies like Yoplait, who obviously hope they sell more yogurt because of their charitable donation, should make it easier for consumers to boost the donation amount. (I’d like to know if Yoplait’s sales or market share increase during the donation period anyway.)  Yoplait says they’ll donate at least $500,000, but based on the number of lids they receive, they’ll donate up to $1.5 million.

Why not give consumers an online mechanism where they can key in a donation code from each purchased container? It’ll save all the time and money from the current process.  Keep the pink lids for marketing the program and for the donation code.

Or, why not provide a matching program where consumers can donate to the charity through Yoplait.com, and Yoplait will match the donations up to $1.5 million?  Then, the charity will receive $3 million or more in donations, instead of between $500,000 and $1.5 million.  Forget the whole lid redemption process, but keep the pink lids for marketing the program.

With social marketing and digital marketing available, why does Yoplait continue to cling to the lid redemption process?  A new approach could increase awareness of the program and increase the overall donations going to Susan G. Komen for the Cure.

And, Yoplait just might sell more yogurt, too.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Consumers, Marketing, Sales, Social Marketing

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , ,

September 21, 2009

Can you really be private online?

Online privacy is a real concern for most people, more so as social networking becomes mainstream and keeps a detailed record of everything about us.  If you take online privacy seriously, then you’ve likely set yourself some stringent privacy settings on sites like Facebook and MySpace, and you’re careful about your Twitter updates and the information you load into LinkedIn.

Unfortunately, as a recent MIT project shows, you have little control over what someone can learn about you simply from the data you choose to share online.  The MIT project, Project Gaydar, was accurately predicting which males were homosexual simply based on their Facebook friends.  Sure, some of these males likely are already comfortable and upfront about their homosexuality, but in the case of others, they may be trying to hide their homosexuality for any variety of reasons.

There’s a quickly evolving field of social network analysis that points to some potentially troubling privacy concerns for social network users.  Your online connections, links and friends may tell someone more about you than you’d normally be willing to share.  Prospective employers, charity groups, civic groups, political groups and other institutions may be able to make predictions about you–and ultimately decisions about you–without even asking you a single question.

Will the field of social network analysis cause a social networking backlash, or will we all accept the idea that our connections and friends could be used to make assumptions or predictions about us?  Will new laws be required to keep employers from making predictions about job applicants based on a social network analysis?  Will a social network analysis be conducted for prominent politicians and used against them during campaigns?

Funny…the social effects of social networking are only just beginning to be discovered.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Social Marketing

Tagged as , , , , , , ,

September 20, 2009

Are You Marketing to Yourself?

It’s very easy to believe that you absolutely know how, when and where best to reach your customers and prospects with your marketing messages.  Especially after many years of experience with a specific marketplace, you can easily fall into the trap of assumptions and generally accepted truths.

I’ve encountered numerous clients and corporate colleagues who fell into this trap:

“We don’t need a website.  Our customers don’t go online.”

“Why would we send an email when we can send a fax or mail a postcard?  Most of our clients don’t have email.”

“We don’t need an eCommerce site because people in our industry don’t shop online.”

“We don’t need to be on Facebook because that’s for kids.”

“Twitter?  Is that real?  Never heard of it.  None of our consumers would ever use that.”

Change can be unsettling and frightening.  It seems that a new technology pops up every week and it’s a lot of work to figure out how or why to understand its potential marketing opportunities.  It takes a lot less effort to dismiss the new and different, and claim to understand the needs, motivations and behaviors of the marketplace, consumers, clients and prospects.  It’s easy to market to yourself.

If I don’t shop online, then my customers must not do it either.

If I’ve never used Twitter, then it must not be an important marketing tool.

My kids use Facebook and I don’t sell kid stuff, so Facebook is not important for my business.

It takes a lot more work to do the research, conduct interviews, read reports, look at graphs, participate in meetings, conferences, panel discussions and other conversations to stay on top of the changes happening in your business and in your marketplace.

You’re not marketing to yourself.

You’re marketing to your customers and your prospects. You need to figure out how best to market to them, and that takes a lot of effort and a lot of testing.

If it was supposed to be easy, then you wouldn’t get paid to do it.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Advertising, agency, client, Consumers, Marketing, Sales, Social Marketing

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,